Disclosures through 2026 describe a 1.2 GW Texas award, a 330 MW Queensland project, roughly 600 MW of engineering and qualification support in Puerto Rico and a 750 MW North American framework.
These items are frequently listed together as if they were the same kind of commitment. They are not: some are orders, some are memoranda and one is engineering support rather than equipment supply.
The radar table exists to make that distinction visible.
The question
A four-state vocabulary
Order, award, MOU and framework get explicit definitions and English usage rules. Every project record carries exactly one of them, with the original wording retained in a note.
What we compared
The Puerto Rico case
Engineering design and qualification support is a pre-award stage. It is recorded as adjacent, not as a tracker supply order.
Australian supply-chain notes
A set of memoranda with six material suppliers is a local-content signal, not a delivery commitment. It is logged separately from project capacity.
Data box
| Field | Value as reported |
|---|---|
| Texas | 1.2 GW |
| Queensland | 330 MW |
| Puerto Rico | About 600 MW, engineering and qualification support |
| North America | 750 MW framework |
| Australia | 80+ MW and six supplier MOUs |
All figures above are quoted with the unit and reference period used by the primary source. They are reproduced here for reference, not independently re-measured.
Where this reading can be wrong: verification note
Each line comes from a different date and a different issuer and must be checked against its own primary announcement. The Puerto Rico item is not a supply order.
What to watch next
Conversion of MOUs and frameworks into contracted project records.
Primary sources
- FTC Solar Q2 & Q3 2026 results / 8-K
- Ideematec Horizon L:TEC 1P Texas award disclosure
- Linxon / Hitachi Energy / Energy Transition Capital collaboration announcement
Researched and written by the solarrack.wiki editorial desk. Every figure in this article carries a source and a verification note; where a claim could not be confirmed against a primary document, it is labelled as such. Corrections: [email protected]
